The MIT Swift CLI and agent skill puts a labeled, click-through arrow, box, or ring over any window (an Allow button, a 2FA field, the right Chrome tab) without taking focus, and it never clicks, types, or captures the screen itself. Each arrow removes itself on a timer or when the agent exits, installs with brew install franzenzenhofer/tap/bigarrow, and the Show HN passed 400 points.
Using Jellyfish data on about 300 million work events, Fiona Chen and James Stratton find agent adoption raised lines, commits, and PRs by 20 to 30% while completed Jira issues and epics showed no statistically significant gain. They point to review as the bottleneck: PR submission to merge time rose 49% (3.45 days), change requests nearly doubled, and comments per PR rose 35%…
The MIT, self hosted system where a lead agent hands work to Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Amp and other workers in Docker now has a workflow node that runs a child workflow and waits for it, plus an overlay that sends comments on elements of agent built pages straight to the lead. Version 1.169.0 (Oct 11) also adds an optional gate script that skips quiet heartbeat checks and nightly eval runs with regression checks…
The free, open source tool reads the session files Claude Code already writes, so the lead agent gives orders while sub agents join, share their screen with real commands and diffs, and report back, with a who asked whom tree, context gauges, and replays. It runs as a VS Code extension (VSIX for Cursor and Windsurf), via npx @double geste/agent standup open , or as an unsigned desktop app, and its author calls it "mostly for fun.…
The desktop and headless router judges every new user turn to pick an economy or primary model, keeps that choice through tool round trips to reuse the KV cache, and works with Codex, Claude Code, Qoder, Pi, and DeepSeek Harness. Version 0.3.0 (Oct 11) fixes double billed Messages cache usage, improves task continuation, and adds Linux packages that run on glibc 2.31…
Across 50 full stack app builds with GPT 6 Sol and Claude Opus 5.5, only Sol's medium effort team made a statistically significant gain (77.6% to 84.9%), while simply raising Sol's solo reasoning effort added 11.4 points. Opus showed no significant gain from either teams or higher effort, and its max effort team cost about $122 per app…
Spotted something we missed? Start a thread.
